Buy this shirt: https://hhshirt.com/product/ruth-bader-ginsburg-fight-for-the-things-you-care-about-vintage-shirt/
It’s Doublespeak – propaganda. It’s the Ruth bader ginsburg fight for the things you care about vintage shirt it is in the first place but idea that having skin that’s a different color, or dressing or looking different is to be celebrated and approved – but having ideas and beliefs that are different is evil. You can do anything you want, claim anything you want, as long as support a specific power structure and do and believe what it tells you to. And like all propaganda, it’s really about hatred and control. Nope. Canada’s been at least bicultural by design from day 1. It’s still doing fine. I hear the same of Switzerland, for example. I know a lot about China (probably more than your average Chinese person, due to my upbringing). I examine China from a different perspective than Chinese and Americans (or Chinese Americans). I think that’s probably my most unique perspective. I know a lot about US, politically and intellectually, probably more than your average Americans; but culturally not as much as your average American (for example, I don’t understand prom nights, sports fans and civil war reenacting). I know something about Europe, as a part of the “political west”. But I’m not familiar with differences between individual European countries. I know very little about Africa, Middle East, Central Asia, and Southeastern Asia. I know very little about Islam as a religion and a culture.
Overall, I’m Chinese American bilingual and bi-cultural. I’m pretty ignorant about the Ruth bader ginsburg fight for the things you care about vintage shirt it is in the first place but world outside this bubble. One of the ways, probably the main one, that respecting cultural diversity helps a country progress is that it helps to maintain, rather than undermine, national unity. While all countries claim to be “nation-states” representing “one people” the fact is that there is no country which is not multi-ethnic – that is, that does not include a multiplicity of different cultural or ethnic subgroups. In the past, it was believed that forced assimilation of all ethnic groups in a country into a single national identity – usually that of the dominant group in the society – was the basis for national unity, and that ‘tolerating’ cultural diversity undermined it. This idea is still represented by people who, mistakenly, claim that it would be better if we were just “all one people” and not have any ethnic or other cultural diversity. Note that this belief is almost invariably held by members of the dominant ethnic or cultural group in the society, who expect that everyone else should simply assimilate to their identity.
Home: https://hhshirt.com/
Comentários