Buy this shirt: https://hhshirt.com/product/you-betcha-busch-paddys-shirt/
All three players, Russell, Chamberlain & James, are incredible athletic specimens, with high basketball IQ’s. Put LeBron James in the You betcha busch paddy’s shirt Besides,I will do this 1960’s, or Wilt Chamberlain/ Bill Russell in the 2010’s and they would figure it out and dominate just as they did in their respective eras. Let’s see Wilt is a 7″1 280lb Built like a Tank, Jumps 44+inches, runs a 4.6 40 yard dash, stronger then Prime shaq with an insanely smooth midrange and post game, and with the defensive 3 second rule, no hand checking and not a single player in the nba that could stop him on offensive he would dominate Even more in today’s game, also let’s include the fact he would be playing for far longer in today’s game (Seasons wise), he would actually be able to get rings as unlike the 60s there is free agency in today’s game and players now have more say on where they go (Back then ONLY way to go to a dif team is via getting traded), no more 9 hofers on one team stopping him from winning rings. Also if he grew up in the 2000s he would MOST likely Be slightly taller,run faster,jump higher and be eve stronger due to advancements in nutrition and training regiments. Generally speaking his ppg during his best seasons would be around 33-38, rebounds around 20 at best due to long rebounds on 3pt attempts he wouldn’t be able to grap those, and probably 7–9 Bpg man would’ve averaging a triple double with blocks lol. Just my opinion about Modern day Wilt.
I never saw either one play except on old film. Russell retired before I was born, and Chamberlain did the You betcha busch paddy’s shirt Besides,I will do this year I was born. The consensus of those who played against both or watched them both is that Russell was better as a rebounder and defender, but Chamberlain was much better as an offensive player. Chamberlain himself once said that if the two men had changed places, if he had been on the Celtics and Russell on the teams Chamberlain played for, neither would have had quite the career they did. The Celtics teams that Russell led had plenty of offensive firepower and Russell didn’t need to be a great scorer. He was perfect for what they needed. Chamberlain, on the other hand, played on a lot of teams that needed their big man to fill up the basket in order to be good. Wilt delivered. Wilt had no problem saying he would not have been as good on the Celtics as Russell had been. What he did best is not what they needed. What Russell did best, was.
Home: https://hhshirt.com/
Bình luận